<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subscribe Now!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kadetcomm.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/subscribe-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kadetcomm.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/subscribe-now/</link>
	<description>communications that move people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kadet</title>
		<link>http://kadetcomm.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/subscribe-now/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kadet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kadetcomm.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Hey, BD...thanks for writing...

I guess in the end, it depends on why you want to use RSS.  For me, and many, I think, it&#039;s a way to quickly and on a ongoing basis aggregate content from many sources into one place, sorted by category. To do this it needs to be &quot;real simple&quot; and fast.  

I&#039;ve tried a few offline and online readers. To me, Google Reader is indeed the best for just the reason you describe.  When I use it, I&#039;m online, so it&#039;s one click to the website of the original blog.  Otherwise, I get the content update I want, and a quick check as to whether keyword feed searches came up with anything interesting.  

But to each their own -- the overall point is that if you&#039;re going to reach people where they are, you need to find ways to help them happen upon your content -- whether by subscription or search. 

I&#039;m not a reviewer, but I&#039;ve tried a few offline and online readers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, BD&#8230;thanks for writing&#8230;</p>
<p>I guess in the end, it depends on why you want to use RSS.  For me, and many, I think, it&#8217;s a way to quickly and on a ongoing basis aggregate content from many sources into one place, sorted by category. To do this it needs to be &#8220;real simple&#8221; and fast.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried a few offline and online readers. To me, Google Reader is indeed the best for just the reason you describe.  When I use it, I&#8217;m online, so it&#8217;s one click to the website of the original blog.  Otherwise, I get the content update I want, and a quick check as to whether keyword feed searches came up with anything interesting.  </p>
<p>But to each their own &#8212; the overall point is that if you&#8217;re going to reach people where they are, you need to find ways to help them happen upon your content &#8212; whether by subscription or search. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a reviewer, but I&#8217;ve tried a few offline and online readers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burger Daddy</title>
		<link>http://kadetcomm.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/subscribe-now/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Burger Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kadetcomm.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Obviously RSS is an important tool, but I haven&#039;t yet found a good way to use it. I tried a couple of readers, but they all seemed bulky and cumbersome. And Netvibes is slick, but takes a lot of processing power and bandwidth and only gives you the first few lines of the blog anyway.

Then a friend pointed me to Google&#039;s (of course) reader, which consolidates as many websites as you like, lets you organize them into folders, and lets you see the original posting. It&#039;s kind of the &quot;software as a service&quot; version of RSS. Sounds great, right? Well, you don&#039;t get all the images and you can&#039;t see the comments.

So I guess we&#039;re still waiting for that perfect RSS app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously RSS is an important tool, but I haven&#8217;t yet found a good way to use it. I tried a couple of readers, but they all seemed bulky and cumbersome. And Netvibes is slick, but takes a lot of processing power and bandwidth and only gives you the first few lines of the blog anyway.</p>
<p>Then a friend pointed me to Google&#8217;s (of course) reader, which consolidates as many websites as you like, lets you organize them into folders, and lets you see the original posting. It&#8217;s kind of the &#8220;software as a service&#8221; version of RSS. Sounds great, right? Well, you don&#8217;t get all the images and you can&#8217;t see the comments.</p>
<p>So I guess we&#8217;re still waiting for that perfect RSS app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
